Tuesday, 5 October 2010
At the risk of starting another agonised debate . . .
It just seems to me that there’s little purpose, and no real merit, in having two different Kalendars for the two Forms. I’ve never quite got my head round the reasons why the changes were made so as to produce the ‘new’ version; and it seems to me that there might be merit, if one is going to review the whole question, in allowing people to say their piece about the options before a decision is made . . . but the crucial point is that I simply can’t see any merit at all in having two different – often only very slightly different – Kalendars which create particular difficulties for parishes and churches where both Forms are used on a regular basis.